Sunday, June 10, 2012

Cat robots and other Japanese pop culture


Question 2 
Japan’s public diplomacy has changed and adjusted to a world where PD is influenced by regular people and not just governments. The soft power of a country is determined more by citizens of other countries, along with their governments, instead of just their governments. According to Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “The reason for this is that the world has become increasingly democratized. That is, public opinion enjoys much greater influence on diplomacy than before. … What we have now is an era in which diplomacy at the national level is affected dramatically by the climate of opinion arising from the average person” (quoted in Nakamura). 

Because of this, Japan has begun to reach out more to people through its pop culture. This includes building a Japan Creative Centre (JCC) in Singapore to promote Japanese culture and ideals throughout Asia. It also includes a national Manga award that is given to people who promote manga outside the country and finally, a cat robot Anime Ambassador.


One of the first objectives Japan wants to address with its pop culture diplomacy is the idea that Japan is a good model of a country that became developed and is prospering economically and socially. Japan wants its culture and value system to be seen as useful to other countries. Pop culture obviously represents their culture, but it also portrays a culture with a focus on creative arts and a culture in which people have time in their daily lives for leisure to enjoy this culture.

Japan also wants to show other Asian countries they are an important partner economically and socially. Pop culture does exhibit a certain economic prosperity, but it is also simply not enough to convince others that they are a crucial ally. You can’t guarantee that everyone will even like their pop culture. I for one am not a big fan of anime and I think in many parts of the world, it can carry a bit of a nerd stigma.

And finally, Japan wants eradicate all the negative images of an imperial, war-mongering country that it picked up during WWII. But as Nakamura says, pop culture will also not be quite enough to erase such a negative perception. For one, some people feel Japan is ignoring the entire issue. By neither addressing nor apologizing for their involvement in the war, they are angering some countries. It’s also difficult to get by on such an insubstantial PD strategy when other countries, like China and South Korea , actively use Japan’s involvement in the war as part of their own PD strategies.

Overall, pop culture definitely adds ways Japan can leverage their public diplomacy, but it cannot by any stretch support a public diplomacy program on its own. 

2 comments:

  1. I agree that Japan has come to realize that a major source of soft power is the culture developed by and rooted in the Japanese people. However, Japan’s rising position as a cultural “superpower” is due, in large part, to their promotion of subculture icons rather than traditional culture relics. For example, fads such as manga, J-pop, and Pokémon all rapidly gained widespread popularity in the United States during the early 2000s, but once the initial hype died down, the majority of the population moved on to the “next best thing.” Only the extreme fanatics and Japanophiles retained their interest in these cultural exports, which plays into their “nerd stigma.”

    Despite its oscillating life cycle, pop culture can still be a successful public diplomacy tool. The key is in its transmission and its reception. Nye states, “There is an element of triviality and fad in popular behaviour, but it is also true that a country that stands astride popular channels of communication has more opportunities to get its messages across and to affect the preferences of others.” In essence, pop culture is the gateway to introducing others to the Japanese culture. By simply hooking non-Japanese populations to pop culture fads, Japan can build off of that initial interest to build their brand as a “peace-creating nation.”

    So even with short-lived periods of “J-cool” crazes, Japanese pop culture has achieved a major soft power objective, to get foreign audiences to see Japan in a positive light, as well as a major economic objective, to commercialize the export of manga or anime as a means of pulling Japan out of its recession.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It certainly is true that Japan's international image abroad is a positive one. It's effective use of soft power via pop culture over that last few decades has provided Japan, and MOFA with a great window of opportunity for promoting popular aspects of Japanese culture within its public diplomacy. While Japan's 'pop culture (soft power) diplomacy', has yet to cross into it's foreign policies in strengthening its diplomatic relations, it is creating a better understanding of Japan, and Japanese culture. This plays a key role in how other nations, including Japan's closest allies, such the U.S., view Japan subjectively.

    Harnessing a soft power approach to create a better understanding of its culture overseas is one Japan's primary goals. As Seiichi Kondo stated in 'Wielding Soft Power', "by connecting people and organizations in various fields and levels engaged in transmitting its soft power and by offering places for their interpersonal and cross-cultural exchanges, the government should pursue the goal of enhancing the overall effects of its soft power through cooperative interaction and mutual stimulation." (p. 202). This has become a popular approach used by most nations today, including Japan. Since the late 1970s Japan embarked on cultural exchange and learning programs domestically and abroad with the creation of the Japan Foundation (1972), and Japan Exchange and Teaching Programme (1978), also known as JET.

    In expanding its cultural exchange initiative with its Anime Ambassadors Doraemon & Hello Kitty, or with J-pop group AKB48, Japan is utilizing cultural symbols to maintain its soft power influence worldwide. While some nations might view Japan's cultural exchanges and ambassador promotion, as positive (i.e. the U.S. and European nations), others nations might remain impartial. In the case of China and South Korea, both state governments still possess adverse feelings toward Japan, for the Japanese colonialism and attacks, which took place during the Sino-Japanese Wars and WWII. South Korea specifically, has felt that Japan has been whitewashing its past history. While, I agree that history should always be remembered and not ignored, it remains a strong issue for the Japanese government to decide. In this response, I also agree that Japanese 'pop culture' can not be a remedy for strengthening relations between Japan and neighboring countries (China and South Korea). However from the positive effects of its 'pop culture' worldwide, even amongst Chinese and Korean youth populations, Japan can certainly create an effective public diplomacy initiative for building further understanding with both state and populations abroad.

    ReplyDelete